🔗 Share this article

Advocates for a independent schools founded to teach Native Hawaiians describe a new lawsuit targeting the admissions process as a clear effort to ignore the intentions of a Hawaiian princess who bequeathed her fortune to secure a improved prospects for her people about 140 years ago.

The Tradition of Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop

These educational institutions were created in the will of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, the great-granddaughter of Kamehameha I and the last royal descendant in the royal family. When she died in 1884, the princess’s estate held roughly 9% of the archipelago's total acreage.

Her testament set up the educational system using those estate assets to fund them. Currently, the system comprises three locations for elementary through high school and 30 early learning centers that focus on Hawaiian culture-based education. The centers teach approximately 5,400 learners across all grades and have an financial reserve of about $15 billion, a figure larger than all but around a dozen of the nation's top higher education institutions. The schools accept zero funding from the federal government.

Selective Enrollment and Monetary Aid

Admission is very rigorous at every level, with merely around a fifth of students being accepted at the high school. These centers additionally fund approximately 92% of the expense of educating their students, with almost 80% of the student body furthermore receiving various forms of monetary support based on need.

Past Circumstances and Cultural Importance

Jon Osorio, the head of the indigenous education department at the the state university, explained the educational institutions were established at a era when the Hawaiian people was still on the decline. In the 1880s, roughly 50,000 indigenous people were thought to reside on the Hawaiian chain, decreased from a high of between 300,000 to a half-million individuals at the time of contact with Europeans.

The Hawaiian monarchy was truly in a uncertain situation, specifically because the United States was growing increasingly focused in securing a enduring installation at the harbor.

Osorio stated across the 20th century, “the majority of indigenous culture was being sidelined or even eliminated, or forcefully subdued”.

“In that period of time, the learning centers was really the sole institution that we had,” the academic, a former student of the institutions, said. “The establishment that we had, that was only for Hawaiians, and had the capacity at least of ensuring we kept pace of the rest of the population.”

The Legal Challenge

Today, the vast majority of those admitted at the institutions have indigenous heritage. But the new suit, filed in district court in Honolulu, argues that is inequitable.

The case was launched by a organization called Students for Fair Admissions, a neoconservative non-profit located in the state that has for decades pursued a legal battle against race-conscious policies and ethnicity-focused enrollment. The organization took legal action against the prestigious college in 2014 and finally secured a landmark high court decision in 2023 that led to the conservative judges terminate ethnicity-based enrollment in higher education throughout the country.

A website created last month as a preliminary step to the legal challenge states that while it is a “outstanding learning institution”, the schools’ “enrollment criteria openly prioritizes students with indigenous heritage instead of non-Native Hawaiian students”.

“Indeed, that favoritism is so strong that it is practically unfeasible for a student without Hawaiian ancestry to be accepted to the schools,” the organization claims. “Our position is that focus on ancestry, as opposed to academic achievement or financial circumstances, is both unfair and unlawful, and we are dedicated to terminating the institutions' improper acceptance criteria in court.”

Political Efforts

The effort is spearheaded by a legal strategist, who has overseen groups that have filed over twelve lawsuits questioning the use of race in education, industry and in various organizations.

The strategist did not reply to press questions. He told another outlet that while the organization supported the Kamehameha schools’ mission, their services should be accessible to every resident, “not just those with a specific genetic background”.

Learning Impacts

An education expert, a faculty member at the education department at Stanford, explained the legal action targeting the Kamehameha schools was a notable example of how the struggle to undo anti-discrimination policies and guidelines to support equal opportunity in educational institutions had shifted from the battleground of post-secondary learning to elementary and high schools.

The expert said conservative groups had targeted the prestigious university “very specifically” a decade ago.

From my perspective the challenge aims at the learning centers because they are a very uniquely situated establishment… comparable to the manner they selected the college quite deliberately.

The scholar explained although preferential treatment had its detractors as a somewhat restricted instrument to expand education opportunity and admission, “it was an essential instrument in the toolbox”.

“It functioned as part of this more extensive set of guidelines obtainable to schools and universities to expand access and to establish a more just learning environment,” the expert commented. “Eliminating that mechanism, it’s {incredibly harmful